An irregularity is a shape or rule violation. It supposes that objects are built according to rules but there are exceptional cases that don’t really fit or do at least violate our expectations of the building law. An irregularity is singular if the building law is violated in a single case.<\/p>\n
The best known example in Python is the syntax of tuples:<\/p>\n
() # empty tuple\r\n(arg) # parenthesized expression - no tuple!\r\n(arg,) # tuple with one element\r\n(arg1, arg2, ...) # tuple with many arguments<\/pre>\nAnother more recent example is the set syntax in Python 3 which requires an ambiguity resolution involving an empty set and an empty dict:<\/p>\n
{} # empty dict!\r\nset() # empty set !\r\n{arg} # set with one element\r\n{arg1, arg2, ...} # set with many elements<\/pre>\nSome people suggested to drop parentheses around arguments in function calls. This leads to an ambiguity between a function object and function call without arguments. In order to resolve it one might introduce another singular irregularity:<\/p>\n
func # object !\r\nfunc arg1 arg2... # function call with arguments\r\nfunc() # function call\r\nfunc(arg1, arg2, ...) # function call with arguments<\/pre>\nAre singular irregularities design mistakes or are they acceptable trade offs for avoiding verbosity and\/or the introduction of even more syntax?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An irregularity is a shape or rule violation. It supposes that objects are built according to rules but there are exceptional cases that don’t really fit or do at least violate our expectations of the building law. An irregularity is … Continue reading